Talk:Cyber Sunday (2007)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Cyber Sunday (2007) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] Batista Bomb
Yes Batista did do two Batista Bombs, but then went for a pin and Undertaker kicked out. Batista 1 Batista Bomb and then got the win [1]. It should not say he pinned Undertaker after 2 Batista Bombs, it should say he won after a Batista Bomb. TJ Spyke 00:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- This does not matter. It was still two consecutive finishers. Batista didn't win after one powerbomb, he won after TWO. --Maestro25 06:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- I explained this on an IP's talkpage. I will use an analagy to make this simple. You know the 1UP trick in certain Mario games? If you jump on two enemies and then miss, the count is reset. The same thing happens here; when Batista went for the pinfall attempt, that "reset" it. He did NOT hit two consecutive Batista Bombs. He hit 1 went for a pin, then went for another Batista Bomb. TJ Spyke 06:27, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Lets comprimise. We write after two batista bombs and add a subnote saying he went for the pin on the first one.(not in those exact words.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Masterman4 (talk • contribs) 20:59, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- But that's not accurate. The whole point is to list the move used to win the match. The first Batista Bomb did not do that since he went for a pinfall attempt and failed. If he had used the 2 Batista Bombs in a row, that would be different. TJ Spyke 00:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
What about edges spears back at new years rev. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Masterman4 (talk • contribs) 22:22, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
If that's how it's always been, why did it used to say (I just went and changed it) that Rock beat Austin at WM19 with 3 Rock Bottoms, and Edge beat Cena with 2 spears at NYR06? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.110.23.67 (talk) 23:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Because Rock did 3 Rock Bottoms in a row, he didn't go for pins in-between. Edge did, and has not been changed as well to say one. TJ Spyke 01:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Rock did go for pins in between each one. See? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vobf2eNwgw The Undertaker/Kane match at WrestleMania 14 is the same way in it's article, listing 3 Tombstones despite pins in between them all. Man, for something that's ALWAYS been done this way, there sure are quite a few that haven't been done this way, when you'd think they would. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.110.23.67 (talk) 18:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Removal of GA nominee
There are several issues that still need to be addressed before this article is ready to be a Good Article candidate. Please provide reliable third party sourcing (something other than WWE.com), add to the aftermath section, and wait for the article to stabilize. Once these concerns are addressed, please leave a note a WPT:PW that you feel the article is ready to be nominated. Wait one week for the members of the Wrestling WikiProject to help copyedit and look over the article. Then, if nobody opposes, the article can be nominated. Thanks. Nikki311 20:41, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
