Template talk:Cv
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Documentation
| Vandalism: {{uw-vandalism1}}, {{uw-vandalism2}}, {{uw-vandalism3}}, {{uw-vandalism4}}, {{uw-vandalism4im}} |
| Content removal: {{uw-delete1}}, {{uw-delete2}}, {{uw-delete3}}, {{uw-delete4}} |
| Testing: {{uw-test1}}, {{uw-test2}}, {{uw-test3}}, {{uw-test4}} |
| Spam linking: {{uw-spam1}}, {{uw-spam2}}, {{uw-spam3}}, {{uw-spam4}} |
| Other behavior: see Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace. |
Warning templates should always be used with the "subst:" keyword, as strongly suggested on Wikipedia:Template substitution. They are shown without subst here to reduce the display space occupied by this table, not to encourage their use without subst. For example, type {{subst:uw-vandalism1}}~~~~ (not {{uw-vandalism1}}) to warn common first-time vandals.
The levels of templates are:
- Assumes good faith
- No faith assumption
- Assumes bad faith; stern cease and desist
- Assumes bad faith; strong cease and desist, last warning
[edit] Usage
Please do not use this template; use one of {{uw-copyright1}} through {{uw-copyright4}} instead.
| Usage | Output |
|---|---|
| {{subst:Cv}} | |
| {{subst:Cv|Article}}* |
- *You can use {{subst:Cv|Article|subst=subst:}} to substitute the contained ParserFunctions.
[edit] Copyright holders as editors
Should the template cover cases in which the person who makes the edit is the copyright holder? WP:COPY#Contributors.27 rights and obligations --Usgnus 02:11, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Why subst?
I know that in some cases, subst is required due to limitations in MediaWiki ({{prod}} being one such case), but this template doesn't seem to fall into that category, so why is subst recommended? -Harmil 19:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

