User talk:Cutler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1 Fine by me
2 two "weird" articles for dyk
3 UK Legislation Infobox
4 DYK
5 Lucia de Berk
6 Image copyright problem with Image:AJTC logo.png
7 sup vs. small
8 Hi
9 Infobox UK legislation
10 St. Petersburg paradox

[edit] Fine by me

Your "weird" article works for me and there are a lot of legal pages that are useful and this would be a nice example for DYK. The link to Matisse gives a nice hook (and illustration!). Tell you what is odd, I wrote Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations yesterday. It needs a co-author to take it to 2,000 words ... any interest? Victuallers (talk) 15:20, 6 March 2008 (UTC) ...o yours is now nominated. Not sure the picture can remain in your article under fair use ... it could be argued that the "true owner" is very likely to object to any showing of this image. Victuallers (talk) 23:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] two "weird" articles for dyk

...that the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations required all of the 241 UK work related deaths in 2006/7 to be reported - even if the victims take a year to die? by Cutler and Victuallers OK? I think you have ended up doing a lot more than I expected... but there should be 2 odd articles now :-) Victuallers (talk) 11:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		For your great work on RIDDOR. There is a class at Wilsthorpe Business and Enterprise College who used our/your page this morning! Victuallers (talk) 12:12, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] UK Legislation Infobox

Just to let you know, I have folded the two UK legislation infoboxes together. I have taken the code from your version and made three tweaks. The IF statements that you had used for three of the rows at the bottom of the table have been altered so that if there is not text for those parameters the rows do not appear in the table at all. It is simply a cosmetic change to make the table appear more neat when nothing has been entered into those three rows. I have altered all of the links to the version that you created to the other version of the template, simply because its capitalisation is more consistent and more articles use it. I will add the table of links to legislation to the bottom of those articles which do not have it. David Newton (talk) 22:23, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

An open question/suggestion for you and David Newton: Shouldn't Template:UK legislation and Template:British legislation lists, Acts be merged? – Swid ^{(talk · edits)} 05:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

On 10 March 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

- no idea why this wasn't awarded by "central" DYK people ... but I saw it and "doesn't do" to moan at volunteers - we do our best. Victuallers (talk) 16:14, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

On 11 March 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 09:09, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Lucia de Berk

You requested the report of the CEAS in the case of Lucia de Berk. My memory says that there was an original translation of this. But I will give you what I can find. http://www.luciadeb.nl/english.html http://jokerxl.com/Lucia/Lucia.html http://www.om.nl/dossier/themadossiers/commissie_evaluatie_afgesloten_strafzaken__posthum/_nieuwsberichten/32473/

I will keep on searching for the English version of the report, till I'm proven wrong ... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.156.190.62 (talk) 15:11, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:AJTC logo.png

Thank you for uploading Image:AJTC logo.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:04, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] sup vs. small

At the time I used the <sup> tag rather than the <small> tag I did not have any particular reason for doing so. However, after having looked at the results of the two I think that the superscript tag is the superior one to use. The whole point of shrinking the text is to save space. Both of the tags create text that is the same size. However the superscript text has less white space between the lines and thus takes it considerably less vertical screen real estate. David Newton (talk) 17:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hi

Note: This section has been courtesy blanked per a request by the subject of the article being discussed. If you have any questions, please do not hesitiate to contact me, preferably by email. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 04:02, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Infobox UK legislation

You appear to have created a duplicate of {{Infobox UK Legislation}} at {{Infobox UK legislation}}. Is there any particular reason for this? Road Wizard (talk) 13:52, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

I see from an earlier topic above that David Newton merged the code from the l box into the L box. I assume therefore that the l template can be made into a redirect. Let me know if you have any problem with this. Road Wizard (talk) 13:57, 24 May 2008 (UTC)