Talk:Cupid and Psyche

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Discussion cut from main page 2 Discussion 3 Cupid or Eros - cleanup needed 4 Why Psyche can be the daughter of the King 5 Reverting to earlier version

[edit] Discussion cut from main page

I took this commentary from the main page -- it is opinion that fits more properly on the Discussion page (particularly since someone titled it "Discussion"):

[edit] Discussion

Nowadays we already understand, this story only symbolized in the era of around 1800 years ago, women's freedom is only to be packed as a product and only could be chosen by men.

Now most people had already known that this story belongs to a kind of fantasy, not in reality. Because they 2 people actually had no mature minds to experience what is life, and their love were only similar to those teenagers.

I will bite my tongue about the bad grammar, and only hope the original Wikipedians who posted these comments will expand their discussion further. --Procrastinatrix 18:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cupid or Eros - cleanup needed

Pick one name and stick to it. I would suggest Eros, as all the other names seem to be Greek rather than Roman. --71.223.178.110 02:08, 16 October 2007 (UTC) '

But what about the fact that this article is titled "Cupid and Psyche"? Shouldn't that mean we should stick to the use of all Roman names, or change the page name? --France3470 14:29, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Why Psyche can be the daughter of the King

Psyche was an architect and interior designer for her father, her father liked her work so that let him to be his daughter. So Psyche is talent in art this field and other beautiful things. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Powercode2008 (talk • contribs) 13:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reverting to earlier version

I have no clue what happened to this page, but sometime in the past few months, what was originally a fairly comprehensive and well written article has been replaced by something else entirely. I'm reverting back to the Revision as of 20:53, 6 October 2007 by Gawaxay, because after that the article has been replaced by someone's own unreferenced version of the story. I doubt there will be any objections to this but if there please just leave a note here. --France3470 14:49, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

why is the word "sex" in boldface? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.30.218.110 (talk) 23:20, 21 November 2007 (UTC)