User talk:Crystalclearchanges

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/iamandrewrice for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Whitstable 02:10, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

This user is banned from editing Wikipedia.
Please review the banning policy before commenting or unblocking.
(see: block log • contributions • current autoblocks)
This user has been blocked indefinitely because this user has used one or more accounts abusively.

The abuse of multiple accounts is prohibited; using new accounts to evade blocks or bans results in the block or ban being extended.
(Account information: block log • suspected sockpuppets • confirmed socks)

See here for the ban discussion. MBisanz talk 08:12, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Unblock request

I have not done anything disruptive. I put a lot of effort into Latin Europe, and was trying really really hard. I was even called the "most valuable player" on the article, which is surely some kind of achievement (well its the best I've ever had)? Also, as your user scan identified, I have not made any other accounts while I have been here now... does that not show you I am not here to cause trouble? Just please AGF on me unless I do actually do something wrong (which I have not at any time during my time here as Crystalclearchanges) ok? Just at least discuss fairly and openmindedly allowing me to continue editing. Look if I was here to cause disruption would I have really spent hours editing and researching html codes for articles? Please discuss this before coming to a conclusion on this, thank you. Crystalclearchanges (talk) 14:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Though I know this account to be a sock, I do support unblocking him, based on what he said above. It's just this sort of mean-spirited, petty bullshit that has me so disenchanted with Wikipedia. Frankly, this monitoring of every article iamandrewrice has ever edited (here, as well as on Simple), in order to hunt down sockpuppets, is not only childish, but borders on the pathological and obsessive. You can't block his IP, he is not disrupting, so just move on with your lives and let him edit, for God's sake. Jeffpw (talk) 15:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Not disrupting? Please. There was substantial abuse from this account, not even counting that by definition, every single edit was in violation of WP:SOCK and WP:BAN. --Yamla (talk) 15:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Please take a look at your contribution log. As every single edit was made in violation of your ban, every single edit was abusive and in deliberate violation of our policy. Additionally, see the discussion on WP:ANI which lists a number of other specific abuses. As you are a banned vandal, I have protected this page. --Yamla (talk) 17:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC)