Talk:Crossroads (2002 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Crossroads (2002 film) article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

Those teen choice awards seem to be copying their nominations from the Razzies, eh? Kamagurka 15:57, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rating

"The film also featured a few explicit songs that were edited to avoid an R rating."

Could someone care to elaborate? RobbieNomi 00:36, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Critical Reception

The critical reception section needs work. It makes it sound like this movie is a masterpiece by conveniently omitting a large number of negative reviewer's opinions. I added a Rottentomatoes and IMDB reference, but there is still way to much positive spin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.3.20.5 (talk) 05:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

most horrible movie ever made —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.228.83.155 (talk) 05:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Citations need massive review

I've started to find evidence that some of the citations do not actually support the text, and worse, the titles given are misleading and incorrect. If someone with the time and determination is willing to, these should all be gone thru with a fine-toothed comb. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 08:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Okay, looked over the edit history, and it seems that most of these bogus edits are from Password16 and associated sock puppets. As a quick fix, I've reverted back to November 6, 2007 for what (I hope) is an article relatively uncorrupted by misleading cites. However, this may also have reverted some legit work already done. Please, however, do not re-add what appears to be "good" text until you have thoroughly cross-checked its citations first. It's not a perfect solution, but at least should maintain the reliability of the text, which is just as important. Thanks, Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 08:26, 25 February 2008 (UTC)