Template talk:Cricketbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 24, 2007
13:30
Australia Flag of Australia
377/6 (50 overs)		 vs Flag of South Africa South Africa
294 all out (48 overs)		 Australia won by 83 runs
Warner Park Stadium, Basseterre, Saint Kitts and Nevis
Umpires: Mark Benson and Steve Bucknor
Man of the Match: Matthew Hayden
Matthew Hayden 101 (68)
Brad Hogg 3/61		 (Report) AB de Villiers 92 (70)
Andrew Hall 2/60
  • Match shortened due to rain; Duckworth-Lewis revised target to win: 311 runs in 46 overs for Bangladesh.

Really though, what difference does this have from this-

Australia
359/2 (50 overs)		 vs India
234 (39.2 overs)		 Australia won by 125 Runs
New Wanderers Stadium, Johannesburg, South Africa
Umpires: SA Bucknor (WI) and DR Shepherd (ENG)
Man of the Match: RT Ponting (AUS)
RT Ponting 140 (121)
H Singh 2/49 (8)		 V Sehwag 82 (81)
A Symonds 2/7 (2)

I don't really see a lot of difference excep that one's horizontal and one's vertical. It contains the same about of info as the one above it except for the date. So cant we just move this one to the ODI one since it takes less space? And just adjust it a bit so the key is the same so it works for the pages already using the old one?--Thugchildz 05:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi Thugchildz, I am going to make ODI template in the new format, but also compatible with cricketbox template as well as the ODI template names. That way we don't have to go through every template and change it.--Dacium 22:29, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Cricketbox

Template:Cricketbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Thugchildz 06:27, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] This template is now redundant

I have updated the Template:Limited overs international template to match this template. The limited overs international template now accepts entry as the cricket box template does (with the same variables). Therefore this template should now be deleted before it usage spreads.--Dacium 23:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)