Talk:Criticism of the War on Terrorism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Criticism of the War on Terrorism article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability
Archives: 1

March 6, 2005 Peer review Reviewed This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of February 27, 2005.

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects. If you would like to participate, you can improve the article attached to this page, or visit the project page. B This article has been rated as b-Class on the Project's quality scale. See comments Politics Portal This article is supported by WikiProject Anti-war, a collective approach to organizing and unifying articles related to the anti-war movement. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. B This article has been rated as b-Class on the Project's quality scale. See comments

Criticism of the War on Terrorism is included in the 2007 Wikipedia for Schools, or is a candidate for inclusion in future versions. Please maintain high quality standards, and make an extra effort to include free images, because non-free images cannot be used on the CDs.

Archives

1

[edit] Oh my god, why is this article mostly just copied from the main War on Terrorism article?

That pretty much sums it up. VolatileChemical 18:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

• Heu...no ^_^Mrpouetpouet 22:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] This article is nothing like what I'd hoped to find

I expected a rational, (relatively) unbiased discussion of the various criticisms leveled against the 'War on Terror'. Instead what I got were criticisms of the war on terror. Let me make this important point: this article is supposed to be ABOUT the criticisms of the War on Terror, it is not supposed to BE a criticism of the War on Terror. I'm sorry, but even given that I happen to agree with many of the main points espoused, this piece reads more like an Op-Ed then an encyclopedia article. And that's not what I come to Wikipedia for. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.241.26.83 (talk) 07:15, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

A long list of "criticisms" will always look to you like a prolonged criticism; I don't quite understand what you're getting at. What are you looking for? Counter arguments to the criticism? Haha. 165.123.207.134 (talk) 19:33, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] No Tangible Penis

It said that thwre was no tangible penis. Now wtf? I checked wiktionary and all I found was the organ. I know you people seem to think using big, pointlessly complicated words is cool, but are you TRYING to confuse people??!