Talk:Criticism of debt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Philosophy Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
Additional information: Related task forces (core areas): Ethics Social and political philosophy

I removed the part in economics that was favorable to debt. This is a criticism of debt article.

This seems rather narrow. How can one criticise without having any of the positives (or the basic theory)? Put another way, would an article that mentioned any subject only in the positive ("In praise of debt?") make sense without any of the criticisms?--Gregalton 13:06, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Moved from Article to talk page, comment by 64.235.97.59

Comment by 64.235.97.59 follows: (from Feminism section) This is so batshit man-hating insane. Someone please tag this as "disputed neutrality"

Though 64.235.97.59's complaint is unecessarily strongly worded, the statements in that section make bold claims at face value without any citations. It may or may not be true but as it is now, the claims appear baseless. Cites should be added or the section removed. 216.36.186.2 (talk) 14:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)