Talk:Critical Acclaim

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Critical Acclaim article.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Songs because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{Songs}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Album}} template, removing {{Songs}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Critical Acclaim.jpg

Image:Critical Acclaim.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 09:36, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] not correct

it is not fair or accurate to put words into someones mouth or specify a band or group they may not like. thus i am removing the part about anti flag. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bamsenn (talkcontribs) 05:06, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Actually it is correct. Read it online, M. Shadows has mentioned it himself. The band is a bunch of republicans. And use common sense dude, "blaming their own nation for who wins elections...they've never contributed a fucking thing to the country they love to criticize." Don't be an idiot. I'm adding something along those lines because this page need to be more specific about what the song is actually about instead of trying to run around the subject ignorantly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Epwspower (talkcontribs) 21:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Not Neutral Point of View

Is this fair to say things song is criticizing people with Liberal political views or is it just criticizing those who criticize soldiers? There is a difference. (JFerreira 04:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC))

Yes it is fair, but I would agree that there IS a difference. But still, please use common sense. Reread the lyrics if you have to, and read interviews with M. Shadows. This song is primarily against the democratic party. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Epwspower (talkcontribs) 21:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a place where you read into things. If you want to post a quote of him saying this then do so but we cannot go around trying to figure out the meanings of every song and then post it. (JFerreira 04:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC))