Talk:Crime in Melbourne
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Crime in Melbourne is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne. | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian crime. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 To-do list for Crime in Melbourne: |
edit · history · watch · refresh |
|---|---|
|
To create Frank Benvenuto, Victor Brincat |
|
Talk:Crime in Melbourne/archive 1 (April 1 2004 - October 15 2005)
Contents |
[edit] archived
I've archived the old talk the page as the content is now completley different & has been reorganised Agnte 14:05, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Gangland Killings
shouldnt this mention carl williams or tony mokbel? i just noticed it barely mentions organised crime at all.
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Louisecharmianfaulkner.jpg
Image:Louisecharmianfaulkner.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 22:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] "Recent Times"
I have deleted everything within the heading "Recent Times", because the entire section was made up. Cyril Washbrook (talk) 09:26, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
As have I. --A Bothan Spy 10:07, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- The same user seems to have come back a couple of times now to restore the fake section. I've reverted it again. Cyril Washbrook (talk) 09:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- It's back, I will delete it again, anyone able to block 220.236.198.42 from editing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.58.120.11 (talk) 01:16, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Someone keeps reverting it, please keep an eye out as it's pure fiction (speaking as someone who lives in Melbourne) Adonai-aus- (talk) 00:14, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
