Cox v. United States
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Cox v. United States | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court of the United States | ||||||||||||
| Argued October 14-15, 1947 Decided November 24, 1947 |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| Holding | ||||||||||||
| Court membership | ||||||||||||
| Chief Justice: Fred M. Vinson Associate Justices: Hugo Black, Stanley Forman Reed, Felix Frankfurter, William O. Douglas, Frank Murphy, Robert H. Jackson, Wiley Blount Rutledge, Harold Hitz Burton |
||||||||||||
| Case opinions | ||||||||||||
| Majority by: Reed Joined by: Jackson, Vinson, Burton, Frankfurter Dissent by: Douglas Joined by: Black Dissent by: Murphy Joined by: Rutledge |
Cox v. United States, 332 U.S. 442 (1947),[1] was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States that courts have limited scope of review over board's classification of Jehovah's Witness as conscientious objector rather than minister.
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Prior history
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Facts of the case
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Decision of the Court
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Majority decision
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Minority opinions
[edit] Effects of the decision
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Critical response
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] Subsequent history
| Please help improve this section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. |
[edit] References
- ^ 332 U.S. 442 Full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw.com.

