User talk:Countrysweet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Copyright issue with Church on Brady

[edit] Copyright issue Addressed

09:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC) Hello. Concerning your contribution, Church on Brady, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.universal-disciple.com/about%20us.htm. As a copyright violation, Church on Brady appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Church on Brady has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Church on Brady and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Church on Brady with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Church on Brady.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.

In any event, Church on Brady largely duplicates the information you already contributed for Mosaic Church -- there is no need for two separate articles on the same topic. Russ (talk) 09:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Thom Wolf

[edit] AfD nomination issue Addressed

11:57, 31 March 2007 (UTC) An editor has nominated Thom Wolf, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thom Wolf and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 11:57, 31 March 2007 (UTC)