User talk:Count Iblis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Reply 2 Ray's Rules 3 Thank you 4 my responce 5 RfC 6 Your addition at Robot 7 Helmholtz free energy 8 Sources

[edit] Reply

If you disagree with the delisting of the article, then perhaps you should renominate it for an FLC. If someone had given a sign that they were adressing concerns, then it would have been left open, but nobody did so it was delisted. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 14:11, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ray's Rules

I have a list of ten rules as a reminder on my office wall. One is "don't waste your time arguing with an idiot." Apply liberally to affected areas. Raymond Arritt (talk) 15:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

I'm the author of the article Myrzakulov equations and I'm not the author of these equations. But I would like ask you to keep this my article. Ngn 92.46.65.69 (talk) 18:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] my responce

My responce to your "solution" to "combat pedophillia" is to ban all illegeal sites in the USA. The "explict images of underage person(s)" is illegeal and against USA , and International laws. Did you at least read the ANI discussion on the subject of it. Just looking illegeal, its the same thing if someone saw the images at their work , its illegel and wrong. Why would Wikipedia host illegeal images. Their violating USA Laws. And you Count your pro-pedo because you support. SHAME ON YOU . You have been warned.--Rio de oro (talk) 20:24, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

It is an absolutely bloody outrageous personal attack to call someone pro pedo simply because they disagree with you. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 11:05, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Why I did what I did was just standing for what I belive in okay. I just thought it was unethical for grown men to have "images of youth"(umbrella term) in an obsecne manner. I just thought why does wikipedia allow this for. I may have jumped the gun , and acted like Joe MacCarthy , and started a witch hunt for pedos , I'm sorry for that. I just thought that Dr. guy was really a peodphile that hurt kids. I stand for what I believe is right , and good. Okay. I just thought if a person(s) has in poseesion X rated images of kids its illegal offence because of all the laws the USA law has passes in Congrees ,and the Senate okay. The thing about Interpol is that I was just upset by the fact that people didnt do something about the matter regarding the Dr, and his collection OF "PICS". I thought he was from overseas , and I requeted a checkuser on his ip adress, because I thought he broke International Laws on poessing obcene images. There I said it. --Rio de oro (talk) 21:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Actually, you might have had a case there, child porn is illegal. However, a posting a checkuser would be pointless since they wouldn't disclose information to you. I have a feeling that you would have gotten a better response if you would have notified you state attorney general, they could transfer the case to the proper authorities in the area where the abuse was coming from, and I'm sure checkuser would gladly cooperate with any state attorney general unlike regular users like you and me. If it was bonafide child porn, you would not be wasting your time contacting such agencies. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 01:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RfC

I've started drafting a user conduct RfC that you might be interested in here. If you'd like to participate in drafting it, please feel free. Cla68 (talk) 03:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your addition at Robot

Hi. Your sentence would probably make more sense in the Future of robotics article, which could use some help. Thanks. - Dan Dank55 (talk) 02:20, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Helmholtz free energy

If IUPAC says A (rather than F) shouldn't we go with that?

As I understand it, F is deprecated because Chemists used to use it for the Gibbs free energy. Jheald (talk) 15:51, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, my textbooks used F as well, with A used for Availability (a.k.a. Exergy).

But I think A is widely used now (and is used in other articles on Wikipedia). Can I suggest restore A for the time being, but (once you've finished your edits to the rest of the article) maybe raise it at WikiProjects Physics, Chemistry and Engineering, so as to canvass wider opinion at on the talk page? Cheers, Jheald (talk) 16:10, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sources

Perhaps you should improve Count Iblis, as I've left a tag on it ([1]). Your curious username is the reason I visited the article.Bless sins (talk) 04:12, 12 June 2008 (UTC)