Talk:County of Sicily

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is supported by the Sicily WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Sicily on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the Project Page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.


(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

Top This article has been rated as Top-Priority on the priority scale.


This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former Countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of now-defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. (FAQ).Add comments
Middle Ages Icon County of Sicily is part of WikiProject Middle Ages, a project for the community of Wikipedians who are interested in the Middle Ages. For more information, see the project page and the newest articles.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.


[edit] 2 April 2008 edits

First, the Muslims of Sicily were far from annihilated, since many were incorporated into the Norman count's army, see Siege of Capua. Second, Apulia did not end up in Roger II's (not Roger I's) hands because of infighting, but because William II left it to him in his will. Srnec (talk) 20:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Pope Calixtus II had to intervene between Roger II and William II, Duke of Apulia and Calabria because of their fighting, the two were cousins. Well spotted that it was Roger II and not Roger I though. Also as far as I'm aware, the Maltese isles, like the mainland southern Italian Peninsula holdings only became united with the creation of the Kingdom of Sicily.
Also the Muslims were annihilated, they lost the war, the Normans and the Sicilians won, they didn't win by playing chess and drinking tea, they won by heroically triumphing in battle, retaking the land. Lets not try to rewrite histories winners and losers, attempting to play down the realities of ancient warfare, in an attempt to produce some PC Marxist like garbage. - Gennarous (talk) 15:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
"Annihilate" is not a synonym for "defeat". All the "re-" words you use are misleading, since Sicily was never Norman before and it was always Christian in population. "Conquer"/"conquest" is prefectly neutral language whether the conquerors' religion had been previously established or not. The County was not a transitionary period, it may have been in one, but it was a state, maybe a transitionary one, but counties are not periods of time. Srnec (talk) 19:19, 5 April 2008 (UTC)