Talk:County Route S18 (California)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article County Route S18 (California) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
May 31, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Topics California County Routes
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
The map in this article is maintained by the Maps task force.
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality, if possible.
WikiProject Southern California
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Southern California, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage and content of articles relating to Southern California, its people, history, accomplishments and other topics. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.
This article is also supported by WikiProject California.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Article Grading: The following comments were left by the quality and importance raters: (edit · refresh)


Article needs pictures and a map. Dabby (talk) 20:00, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Help?

Where should El Toro Road be categorized to? -- Artisol2345 00:26, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Edit: I got it; never mind. Artisol2345 21:30, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge?

Rschen, why do you believe that El Toro Road should be merged to County Route S18 (California)? 68.4.104.141 (talk) 00:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

The articles describe the same stretch of road. Furthermore, El Toro Road may not be notable by itself. --Rschen7754 (T C) 00:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

All of El Toro Road is part of CR S18; this probably calls for a merge. Is the road particularly "notable", or is it just a standard suburban arterial? --NE2 17:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Not to my knowledge, but then I don't live in Orange County. --Rschen7754 (T C) 03:42, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I do live in Orange County, and I know of El Toro Road. But only half of CR S18 travels on El Toro Road. Do you still believe it calls for a merge? AL2TB Gab or Tab 01:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Um, thats basically what NE2 said above... --Rschen7754 (T C) 01:51, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
NE2 uses a higher level of vocabulary than me. I could not comprehend the words "suburban arterial" accurately. And no, the dictionary did not help either. I'm just in 10th grade... AL2TB Gab or Tab 02:15, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Articles merged. —Scott5114 [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 05:57, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:County Route S18 (California)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    This article's prose quality is beautiful, especially for a county route
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    There is no history pre-2008 in the article - it says 1970 in the infobox, but there has got to be more history pre-2008. There is now some pre-2008 history.
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Not as far as I can see
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    This article has been stable, as well as quiet.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    Not applicable per below.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    No pictures, not even a map of the highway
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

This article meets almost all of the criteria. There are no pictures, but I won't fail or On-hold the article for it. I do wish to see a map request in the next few days however. Anyway, fix the comments listed above and I will pass this article. Thanks. Mitch32contribs 12:30, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

One comment. In the sentence, The route follows in a convoluted pattern from State Route 133 in Laguna Beach to State Route 55 near Orange, "convoluted" is very POVish, and not suitable for an encyclopedia. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 12:43, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about the pictures; I'm not a photographer. However, I'll see what I can do about the pre-2008 history. Can you please hold this GA Review until next Monday? I'm kind of busy this week in school, doing homework, and studying for tests. And I really don't have time to address the problem right now. And yes, my username used to be formerly Dabbydabby. Dabby (talk) 01:54, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

"Convoluted" - POV removed and sentence reworded. Dabby (talk) 02:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC)