User talk:Congyu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Division I-A to I-BS

I know the name sounds like spam, but BS = Bowl Subdivision. Cong Yu 15:51, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for the false correction...indeed it looked like the usual vandalism to me. Thanks for the update. 66.65.76.15 16:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] peyton edit

just wondering why the edit removing whom he is married to. i saw on the discussion page for fmccown you said ashley simpson, but the sentence he added was correct. manning is married to ashley thompson and has been since 2001. i had mentioned it on the talk page, and hoped it would be added in order to quell some of the constant "gay rumors" and gay edits added to his page. (likely by Pats fans, lol) Kmccusker2 06:53, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I thought it was vandalism. Cong Yu 16:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

On the other hand, do we have a good source for his marriage? Cong Yu 16:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, theres the occasional shots of her on TV, or http://espn.go.com/talent/danpatrick/s/2001/0822/1242493.html

an interview with outtakes from him http://www.nfl.com/features/2002/thanksgiving/mannings.html a recent article so yes, there are credible sources for his marriage.Kmccusker2 06:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] List of social networking websites

Hi. I have reverted your insertion of a sortable table due to long-standing concerns discussed in the talk page for the article. Please take a look at the discussions to assess consensus regarding false numbering e.g. 11,000 comes above 10,000,000, which is wrong. If you can format a sortable table which overcomes this major problem, don't hesitate to add it to the List format. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 10:00, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't seem to see the incorrect sorting problem you mentioned here? When you sort, the first click sorts entries from small to large; and the second click sorts entries from large to small (the desired order). I think the benefits of viewing entries in sorted order is significant. Cong Yu 19:11, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

No, it sorts 9s to the top and 1s to the bottom, regardless of how many noughts follow the numeral. Clicking the sort arrows at the top merely turns the problem upside down i.e. sorts the 1s to the top and the 9s to the bottom, regardless of noughts. Have a look at the comments on the talk page, you will see that contributors, including me, all have the same problem. Ref ^(chew)(do) 21:40, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Further to the above, either my computer has changed, or the Wiki source coding has changed, but anyway the sortable table currently being employed at List of social networking websites is working as I had always hoped it would. Thanks and sorry for the fuss. Ref ^(chew)(do)