Talk:Consona Corporation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Indianapolis Portal
Consona Corporation is within the scope of WikiProject Indianapolis, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of metropolitan Indianapolis, Indiana and related subjects in the Wikipedia.
Start This article has been rating as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the Project's importance scale.
Please explain ratings on the ratings summary page.

Contents

[edit] Request for comment

User Tognoni@usc.edu is an employee of this company and keep reverting the changes I do as part of cleaning up the article as outlined in wikipedia guidelines. The user keep adding news and press releases which do not belong in an encyclopedia article. Can someone else please review the article and comment on the edits by me and Tognoni@usc.edu. thanks. --Sleepyhead 08:19, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

As the @USC.EDU implies, I am a student smart guy. Now whether or not you work for NetSuite Inc. is a much easier question. --LeaveMeAlone 10:34, 10 March 2006

[edit] Noteworthy?

Does this company meet WP:CORP? --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 17:21, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

I think it does not. Nothing has appeared in the article since this March comment that even bothers to assert notability, so I think it's safe to bet that it's not notable. I think an AFD is in order? The article as-is is just a bunch of condensed press releases masquerading as history. Not a single link appears to pass Wikipedia:Reliable sources. — Saxifrage ✎ 09:36, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
I would disagree, at least at the moment. Made2Manage just bought Onyx Software Corporation, and that company was considered notable enough to survive a previous VfD. I think that Onyx is no longer notable now that it's been bought (which is why I just nominated it for deletion), but I also think that the flurry of acquisitions by Made2Manage goes a long way toward establishing its notability. I think we should hold off on the deletion process for the Made2Manage article until the process on the Onyx Software article is completed. If the result of that AfD is merge (as it appears it will be), I'll merge the Onyx Software info into the Made2Manage article, and try to dig up some better cites and sources for Made2Manage at the same time; then we'll have a better sense of the combined enterprise's notability. Kickaha Ota 10:58, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] NOT NOT WORTHY

NN CORP, and Vanity —Preceding unsigned comment added by Annietan (talk • contribs)

M2M has been the subject of multiple newspaper articles, and Onyx (which it recently acquired) has too. That satisfies WP:CORP. I very much doubt that the article was submitted by M2M, so it would not seem to be vanity; and even if it were, as WP:VANITY explains in detail, vanity in and of itself is not grounds for deletion. Kickaha Ota 02:31, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Made2Manage Systems

The result of this AfD discussion was Keep.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  15:21, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Made2Manage Logo.gif

Image:Made2Manage Logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)