Talk:Confit byaldi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Recipe

Once the recipe has been transwikied to the Wikibooks:Cookbook as they are specifically excluded from Wikipedia (see WP:ISNOT#HOWTO) - is there enough here to justify an article to itself or would it be better merged into the main Ratatouille article? I think it would be better merged. FlagSteward 21:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

I wrote the article. It's not a recipe. The portion describing how the dish is made is relevant to the dish and its notability, in that this was created for and a significant issue in a major film. It is a separate subject than ratatouille: a different dish with a unique history. Wikidemo 18:04, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Name is a misnomer

This recipe, (Kellers version, the article sems to make no reference to how the original was prepared) may be a unique way of presenting ratatouille but it is certainly not a confit, it's simply pretentious. Confits almost always refer to preserved meats or fruits and occasionally to condiments.Awotter 19:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

The culinary word is full of metaphors and allusions. I would call it creative use of two different languages. Wikidemo 23:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)