Contractibility of unit sphere in Hilbert space
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In topology, it is a surprising fact that the unit sphere in (infinite-dimensional) Hilbert space is a contractible space, since no finite-dimensional spheres are contractible.
This can be demonstrated in several different ways.
Contents |
[edit] Topological proof
First, one can use a purely topological argument, appealing to the Whitehead theorem. This proof proceeds as follows: Let H denote the Hilbert space, and S the unit sphere in H. Consider the k-th homotopy group πk(S). Any element in this group is represented by a map
where Sk is the standard k-sphere. Since Sk is compact, so is its image under γ. Hence the image is contained in some n-dimensional subspace of H. Since the intersection of this subspace with S is an n-sphere, by choosing n large enough (i.e. larger than k), one sees that the map γ is null-homotopic when considered as a map
, hence it is also null-homotopic as a map
. Thus, all of the homotopy groups πk(S) vanish. Furthermore, since the inclusion
induces isomorphisms on all homotopy groups, and all spaces under consideration are connected CW-complexes, the conditions of the Whitehead theorem apply and we can conclude that S is homotopy-equivalent to a point, i.e. contractible.
[edit] Constructive proof via shift operator
Let H be a separable, infinite-dimensional Hilbert space. One can assume H = l2(N), the space of square-summable complex sequences. Let S be the unit ball in H.
The topological proof given in the preceding section is non-constructive. It is possible to prove the contractibility of S by explicitly showing that S deformation retracts to a single point, that is, writing down a homotopy between the identity map on S and a constant map
on S. This can be done in two stages. First we show that the identity map on S is homotopic to the shift operator T restricted to S. Second, we show that T restricted to S is homotopic to e. The desired result then follows from the transitivity of homotopy equivalence.
The shift operator T on H is defined by
T is an isometry (which is not the case if H were finite dimensional), and therefore leaves S invariant. The image T(S) is the equator of S, which is homeomorphic to the sphere S itself (which clearly does not hold in the finite-dimensional case).
Consider the line segment γ from x∈ S to Tx∈ S:
Now T has no eigenvalues. So γ(t) is never the zero vector in H. Thus one can normalize γ to obtain a path in S:
The homotopy defined by
takes the identity to the shift.
Next we show that T is null-homotopic. For each
the path in S defined by (here one again needs the fact that T is an isometry)
goes from Tx to the element (1,0,0...). So the homotopy
takes T to the constant map e. This, together with the homotopy I from the above, proves the claim.
[edit] Second constructive proof
Another manifestation of a separable infinite dimensional Hilbert space is, the function space L2[0,1] , complex-valued functions on the interval [0,1] square integrable with respect to the Lebesgue measure, modulo equality almost everywhere.
Given a function f in S and t ∈ [0,1], define
This is a "sped-up" version of f for the interval [0,(1 - t)], and the constant function 1 on [(1 - t),1]. Direct calculation shows that that ft lies in S for all t ∈ [0,1]. The map H on [0, 1] × S given by
is continuous and therefore a homotopy from the identity map on S to the constant map whose range is 1 ∈ L2[0,1].
[edit] References
- John Baez, "This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics, Week 151", [1]
- Dave Rusin, newsgroup posting http://www.math.niu.edu/~rusin/known-math/93_back/s-infty




![I_t (x) = \gamma'_x(t), \; t \in [0,1]](../../../../math/5/4/d/54dab867fb9cb7db8f34c431d8776911.png)






