Talk:Comparison of Australian and New Zealand governments
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, an attempt to improve, organise and standardise Wikipedia's articles in the area of politics. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.. |
|||
 |
Comparison of Australian and New Zealand governments is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
Comparison of Australian and New Zealand governments is part of WikiProject New Zealand, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
which constitution is similar to the british constitution
[edit] Immigration
New Zealand has had an explicitly racist immigration policy. In particular the Chinese Immigrants Act 1881, the Immigration Restriction Act 1899, the Chinese Immigrants Amendment Act 1907 and the Immigration Restriction Amendment Act 1908 (see here) and this should be integrated into the article. Also, the section on John Howards anglocentric immigration policy requires some evidence of the existence of such a policy and is bordering on not being NPOV.--Mattinbgn/ talk 12:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Immigration (again)
Instead, the Anglo-centric immigration policies of the Liberal-National coalition has kept One Nation's immigration thoughts in the public mind.
No. The current immigration policies of the Howard are not "Anglo-centric". Yes, Howard is big on illegal immigration and he also loves the monarchy. It is also true that Howard, unlike some other liberals such as Jeff Kennett, Peter Costello and Tony Abbott, preferred a more concilitory approach to dealing with One Nation. However ultimately immigration into Australia (as I've said before) is both high and non-discrimintory. This is what matters and therefore I am getting rid of this most unfair line.Teiresias84 03:50, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Original Research?
Please see my comments at Talk:Politics_of_Australia_and_Canada_compared#Original_Research. AndrewRT(Talk) 22:42, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
