Talk:Compact car
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ok -- added two pictures of compact class automobiles. CZmarlin 16:06, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] front-wheel drive?
should it be mentioned that most (do object if i'm wrong), are front-wheel drive cars, with transversal engines?
Jerome Potts 05:09, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] European/RoW usage of term
The article stated that the term is uncommon in Europe. However, see e.g.
[1] (UK site)
"Audi is set to shake the compact car market again, this time with its all-new A3."
The use may not be standard in the UK, but is still fairly widespread. German usage applies the term "Kompaktklasse" to cars like the VW Golf, the new MINI Cooper etc.; see German Wikipedia.
The term is also common in the UK in compounds such as "compact MPV" and "compact SUV". Jayen466 14:48, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep the two articles as seperate entities as they both can mean very different things. 81.145.241.165 05:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] saloon vs sedan
The article mentions cabriolets, saloons, and estates. As an American reader, the only one of these words I've even seen applied to cars before is cabriolet. After following the links, I learn these terms are apparently British usage for convertibles, sedans, and station wagons. Is there some reason for using the British words? The actual links all redirect to articles whose titles are the American terms, so it seems like the American terms should be used for consistency. I have not changed this, though, because I understand the need for a global perspective, and I don't really know the Wikipedia policy on this. Could someone help clarify? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.0.89.92 (talk) 19:04, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] part of text violating somebody's copyright?!?
The article talks about the origins of the compact car in the US. This text appears to be almost identical to text at http://www.car-portal.us/en/Automobile-Reference/Car-Classifications/Compact-Car/. Somebody needs to make sure that there isn't a copyright violation going on somewhere. —Preceding unsigned comment added by N'Awlins Contrarian (talk • contribs) 14:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

