Talk:Collaborative method
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject. |
| Start | rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale |
| Mid | rated as Mid-importance on the assessment scale |
 Portal |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, which collaborates on Psychology and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.
|
||||||||
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Graphic design, which collaborates on graphic design-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| ??? | This article has not yet been rated on the assessment scale. |
|
Suggested article edit guidelines:
|
|
|
Please rate this article and leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
|
Contents |
[edit] Group Values
Hello. I realized that we can be more efficient in writing this article, if we listed and agreed upon some group values. Please do contribute.
1. Freedom of Information
Signed, 146.145.210.126 17:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] April 2007 updates
I will be editing Collaborative methodologies and other related pages for an undergraduate thesis project. Because the project and pages are about collaboration, this would be a great place for us all to converse, please collaborate with me and provide feedback. --Parhamr 03:44, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- Fair play, you are making a decent job of this page. Just be careful not to inject original research or novel synthesis that might form part of your thesis but would be against policy but besides that mild suggestion - great job! --Fredrick day 09:50, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Methods?
Why methodologies? Wouldnt Collaborative method mean the same thing? MidgleyDJ 09:08, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- Moved. :-). MidgleyDJ 09:20, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Excessive lists
At this time there are sixteen individual lists. Please help convert the non-essential lists into prose! —Parhamr 18:53, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- I made some fixes but none were really outright rewrites as prose; it is currently 'ok' but not optimal —Parhamr 01:24, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Avoid becoming a 'how-to'
WP:NOT#INFO—please note that editors should avoid turning this article into a 'how-to' —Parhamr 01:02, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Learner type percentiles
The percentages given for the proportions of different leaner types (e.g., auditory, visual and kin) in the population are directly contradicted in the linked article on Kineasthetic learners. This article gives percentiles of 40, 30 and 30 percent respectively: the other gives values of 10, 60 and 30 percent. Clearly, one set of values is wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.222.5 (talk) 23:47, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- The cited source for this article states she derived her info from "Myers-Briggs and other psychological theories," while the source for the kinesthetic article is a martial arts web site that in-turn has no citation. Wikipedia's policy of verifiability and guideline of reliable sources would lead me to believe this article's source is correct. Thank you for asking this question! —Parhamr 23:59, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
