Talk:Cold air intake

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is it necessary to promote the manufacturers? Seems like some subtle marketing wars.

66.69.71.250 20:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Justin

No, it isn't necessary. Wikipedia is not here to give free advertising to companies. This is a site to give information, not to endorse products. Some companies don't understand this, judging by the reaction to my reverting of a few past link additions.

Jax184 03:51, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

I removed the Do-It-Yourself air intake chunk since it was horrible to read. Feel free to restore it if you can fix it.

Lavenderbunny 20:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Why is there a picture of short ram intake on an article about cold air intakes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.3.154.201 (talk) 08:11, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Indeed, the pictured system may get any kind of air but it most certainly won't be cold air. It gets warm air from the radiator and it will decrease power instead of increase. What does it have to do with the 'cold air intake' topic? I don't know and will remove it from here if noone objects. Saying that, the article actually nowhere justifies the title of "cold air intake" since no method of obtaining the actual cold air is mentioned. Moreover, it seems like there is no importance of getting cold air, so how is it "cold air intake" anyway? Looks more like another article about short ram intake than anything. :arny (talk) 00:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

any word on the impact of a cold air intake on fuel economy? --75.72.165.109 (talk) 17:13, 21 May 2008 (UTC)