Talk:Cold Stone Creamery
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Menu?
...Maybe it's just me, but it feels like this page is more of an ice-cream menu than something about the company. I'm not sure how to fix that, but I'm just saying.
- 65.7.151.65 (talk · contribs) 06:28, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] But it is a game...
I did create this article, and I felt that a recent BusinessWeek article compelled me to do this. Well, I guess Stone City (game) could be moved there.
[edit] Logo
The logo underneath the title seems a bit out of place. Should someone move it? Tamajared 21:06, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Removed
Removed uncited claim. Add it later if you have the facts. Seems like a lot of the edits on this page are from Marble Slab corporate goons trying to use wikipedia to undermine their competitors. Nice job, guys. Real classy.
[edit] Homosexual employees?
yo wuz ^^^mui When a customer places a tip in the tip jar (usually above a predetermined minimum amount), the homosexual employees will immediately break out in a catchy little Cold Stone song,
i'll be changing it if i find out how —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.11.224.27 (talk) 03:41, 8 December 2006 (UTC).
- Wait, now I'm confused. Do the homosexual employees refuse to sing or what? BonniePrinceCharlie 23:56, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Caribbean
There are a couple stores in Puerto Rico and it keeps expanding.. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BoricuaPR (talk • contribs) 04:07, 22 January 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Neutrality
I just added the neutrality tag. There is nothing negative to balence out the positive in this article. --Umalee 02:04, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- And this is a problem because...? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.144.60.229 (talk) 09:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC).
- Because we aren't a promotional service.--Drat (Talk) 09:37, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- If there's anything specific you'd like added or removed from the article, please feel free to speak up. As it is, people aren't going to hunt around for random bad stuff to say about the company in order to "balance out" this article. I'm taking off the POV tag. Rhobite 05:10, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- That snarky comment ("Because we aren't a promotional service.") sure explained why the tag was on there. Totally. Utterly. 74.225.130.13 10:55, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Whether the article sounds like a promotional piece has little, if nothing, to do with the neutrality tag. In the case that it sounds like a promotion or an advertisement, a better tag would be the {{advert}} tag. --132 18:45, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Because we aren't a promotional service.--Drat (Talk) 09:37, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- An article doesn't have to have a controversy or criticism section if there is no controversy or criticism surrounding the topic. The neutrality tag is meant for articles that have known criticisms, but they aren't mentioned in the article or people remove them when they are added. The tag shouldn't be used to try to dig up, or even make up, controversy about the subject simply because there isn't a section present. If there is no controversy, then there is no reason for including it. If there is controversy it should then, and ony then, be included. --132 18:43, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Howbout how annoying they are?
[edit] Biased Opinion on Tipping
"Continuing in the absurdity of customer-facing tips jars for the remuneration of work already adequately compensated"
Does that comment seem to express an opinion that is unwarranted in this article? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.173.127.131 (talk) 02:00, 16 May 2007 (UTC).
[edit] So redundant
"Like other franchises, Cold Stone Creamery attempts to provide customers with similar service at every store by supplying instructional material and training videos to franchise owners."
Right; that's what a franchise is. 68.81.106.2 05:01, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
