Talk:Coherent sheaf

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Mathematics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, which collaborates on articles related to mathematics.
Mathematics rating: Start Class Mid Priority  Field: Geometry

I think the definition given for a coherent sheaf on a ringed space is wrong, or at least, disagrees with Grothendieck's definition in Éléments de Géométrie Algébrique, (1971 edition, 0.5.3.1). The definition currently on this page is what Grothendieck calls a sheaf of finite presentation (0.5.2.5). The advantage of coherent sheaves is that they form a full exact abelian subcategory of the category of sheaves, while finitely presented ones do not.

To see that these notions are not equivalent, take a commutative ring A having an element a whose annihilator is not finitely generated. Then if X is Spec A, the sheaf OX is finitely presented, but not coherent. If it were coherent, then by (0.5.3.4) (stating that the kernel of a morphism of coherent sheaves is coherent), the annihilator of a should be a finitely generated ideal. Namely, consider the morphism from OX to itself given on global sections by multiplication by a. An example of such a pair A, a is given by the element x in Z[x,y1, y2,...]/(xy1, xy2,...). 136.152.196.72 10:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

You are right. I have corrected the definition and expanded the article a bit. A lot stillremains to be done here ; I added some to do items on the comments page. Stca74 09:28, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] complex space

"Ideal sheaves: If Z is a closed complex subspace of a complex space X, the sheaf IZ of all holomorphic functions vanishing on Z is coherent."

What is a complex space? Does it mean a complex vector space? --Acepectif 05:49, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

I think what it means is complex manifold. 131.111.24.224 14:56, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Oops, forgot to log in. The last comment was by me: Artie P.S. 14:57, 6 August 2007 (UTC)