Talk:Codex Vaticanus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Link to faximile doesn work :(

• Found another link to it, should work now (warning: 16MB PDF file!) - Heycos 10:41, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] NPOV

This article implies, without justification, that new testament books that were missing from the codex vaticanus were "missing pages." However it is clear that consensus about which books merited inclusion in the New Testament had not been reached by the date of the codex. Argument must be made to support the claim that the codex originally included the Pastoral epistles, Philemon and Revelation--otherwise, the term missing pages should be changed. --CRATYLUS22 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.42.143.168 (talk) 22:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)