Talk:Coalition for Inclusive Scouting
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] non-official patch
err ... that isnt an official patch ... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.242.147.131 (talk • contribs)
[edit] Avoid User: stuff
The Inclusive Scouting Distinguished Service Award is awarded by the Coalitions for Inclusive Scouting to persons who have spoken out against the Boy Scout policies at a substantial personal risk. Awardees include James Dale (see Boy Scouts of America v. Dale), Matt Hill (see www.matthillnc.com or Wikipedia User Page Matthillnc).
Fplay 00:42, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] You are right
You are right that isn't an official patch. It is a patch created by current and former members of the Boy Scouts committed to making the BSA a safe and welcoming place for all youth members and leaders, regardless of sexual orientation.
[edit] Name of article
I think the name of the article should be Coalition for Inclusive Scouting, not plural. --Jagz 00:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Website status?
What happened to the Coalition's website?[1] --Jagz 00:46, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Does the Coalition still exist? Should this article be deleted? --Jagz 13:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- It doesn't appear to exist anymore and should be deleted. When the only current links to an organization using a Google search are to stories over two years old and to the Wikipedia article itself, it shows that the organization is no longer viable or relevant. GCW50 19:32, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
The domain registration expired on 10 April 2007. [2] --Gadget850 ( Ed) 11:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- ... and the G/LEARN site, which is currently dead, expires on 20 April 2007. [3] --Gadget850 ( Ed) 11:43, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
We should probably consider merging this into Boy Scouts of America membership controversies. I'm not sure what would fit. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 20:18, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Both sites were offline for quite some time and the domains have expired. I think at this point, that the coalition exists only as a historical reference. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 12:55, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:ISA wt 120.jpg
Image:ISA wt 120.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Watchlist
| User:Gadget850 has abandoned this article and has removed it from his watchlist |

