Talk:Clitoral hood piercing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Horizontal Clitoral Hood Piercing
Horizontal Clitoral Hood Piercing: "This usually includes having a gigantic metal ball sitting right on the clit, causing girls to shake their legs incessantly for instant pleasure." I did some research into the truth of this statement and found nothing that appeared to be legitimately scientific. Comments? Kialari 21:50, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
- I thought I removed that particular piece of vandalism/POV/crap a while back. Thanks for catching it. Although the piercing is usually placed to stimulate the clitoris casually, there isn't any evidence, even anecdotal, that wearers engage in the described behavior. We get a lot of pseudoscience & urban legend here in the body modification area of Wikipedia. Glowimperial 20:34, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
-
- Scientific evidence..? please. just ask a girl. (else you may conduct a doule blinded full scale test including a neutrality text group. sleep with all of them(including the ugly ones) and report your findings in a statistical manner. lol.--Procrastinating@talk2me 19:08, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
-
"There are urban legends about hood piercings (which are often confused with clitoris piercings) either causing uncontrolled sexual stimulation or even orgasm, or where the constant stimulation leads to the desensitization of the clitoris and the difficulty or inability of the bearer to orgasm. There are no known cases of either of these things occurring." I am not sure I agree with this. I read a lot of reviews from a lot of different places/people over about 3 years before getting my vch, and I have read that it is indeed possible to be desensitised from a vertical piercing due to the constant stimulation. However the problem is usually fixed by changing or removing the jewellery.
[edit] Disgusting pictures
Dont you think it is disgusting and nonacademic to post gratuitous nudity on these public boards. Just because of this, Wikipedia is probably banned in all kinds of schools and stuff. People are probably going to respond by saying, oh this is about education and has to be real, well, too bad poor little Timmy from History class wont be able to find information on WWII because of your fetish of showing disturbing images to everyone! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Philiplynch (talk • contribs)
- Wikipedia is not censored (see WP:CENSOR); you can imagine it would be very difficult to find where to draw the line to avoid offending anyone's tastes. --TeaDrinker 17:19, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Disturbing images? Fetish? YOU found your way here, I wonder how that happened.. BirdbrainedPhoenix (talk) 03:53, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

