Talk:Climate change denial/Archives/2008/4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

The title is not appropritely neutral.

one look at Wicktionarys page on denial will show that it is not a neutral term when used this way, it must also be considered that "denial" was coined by oppoents of the view, I see no reason this should not be changed.--70.152.25.58 (talk) 21:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

"Denial" is what reliable, notable and verifiable sources say. We don't invent the term, we just document it. Your beef may be with the Royal Society, The Guardian, Newsweek, and even Rolling Stone. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 21:44, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Read the first paragraph of the article. This article is about outright denial, and begins by making a distinction between that and good-faith skepticism. (Note that I am very much a global warming skeptic myself.) --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 21:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC)