User talk:ClearsightWisdom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of DavidYork71.
Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Block abuse by User:Gnangarra achieved reintroduction of spelling mistakes and reducing the comprehensiveness of article citations"

Decline reason: "The fact that you created 3 alternate accounts to redo your edit is evidence that you have some ulterior motive. The article you were editing is aparently one of DavidYork71's previous targets. If you are DavidYork71, then any edit you make should be reverted on sight. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:09, 16 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "With your speculation and talk of "ulterior motives" you are beyond belief. That there is an article that is or was of interest to somebody has no importance to the mission of Wikipedia. The issue is you approving convenient excuses so the abusive element can reintroduce spelling mistakes and downgradings of the quality of article and reference content."

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.