Talk:Clayton Utz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Portal	Clayton Utz is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] POV

This article is a blatant breach of NPOV and makes a series of claims without any citations. The firm is notable and has been involved in a series of notable cases and is a good candidate for an article, but given the above, if it is not substantially improved I feel it should be nominated for deletion.--Mattinbgn/ ^talk 02:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

The article has been amended now. --Iamlh 06:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

The claims are cited, and to a very respectable and neutral - the Australian ABC. So I'm not quite sure what the problem is, as this is the main case most Australians would know of Clayton Utz, I feel it is important to mention it and the criticism of CU, just as the criticisms of most other organisations are mentioned. Now surely, they are not placed in the best place of the article and perhaps could be worded better - but I dont see how simply removing it is a solution? Why not actually fix the problem instead of just censoring it? Colourinthemeaning (talk) 06:51, 22 April 2008 (UTC)