Talk:Clay-with-Flints

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article incorporates text from the Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition, now in the public domain.

"it was argued that the general principle of that engagement was contingent on the prior realization of its particular object, which had failed, and the treaty had determined as a special contract; moreover, none of the additional treaties to embody the general principle had been negotiated, and Great Britain had not even offered co-operation in the protection and neutrality guarantee of the Panama railway built in 1850-1855, so that her rights had lapsed; certain engagements of the treaty she had violated, and therefore the whole treaty was void," Huh! This clearly is not meant to be here. Any thoughts?