Wikipedia:Cite specific evidence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This Wikipedia page is currently inactive and is retained as a historical archive. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus has become unclear. If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you should seek broader input via a forum such as the proposals page of the village pump.

In both articles and discussions, it is highly advisable to cite specific evidence. In articles, this helps the veracity of statements. In discussions, specific evidence helps get your point across more effectively, while also serving to prevent flame wars from erupting from a misconstrued comment.

[edit] Examples

Bad

This article is clearly biased against the subject.

Good

This article does not seem to meet NPOV standards. There are weasel words in the "Critical Reception" section, such as where it says "many critics felt that..."

Bad

[name] has a flawed philosophy.

Good

[name]'s philosophy has some flaws in it. For example, he assumes that X will happen if he does Y, but that does not necessarily follow.