Talk:City of Joy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	France Portal City of Joy is within the scope of WikiProject France, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments, explaining the ratings and/or suggest improvements.)

	Literature Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article needs an infobox template! - see Novels InfoboxCode or Short Story InfoboxCode for a pattern
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

As per the book, the name of the colony was Anand Nagar. Anand means Joy. Not sure about name in the movie.Npindia 16:07, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Split

They should definitely be split off. The movie is horrible, and bears little resemblance to the book.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kdsnyder (talk • contribs) .

A check on IMDB confirms the film is based on the book (the article text wasn't quite clear on this). But I can't see that the film itself is noticable enough to justify its own article. I would have though a simple line such as "The 1992 film 'City of Joy' was loosely based on the book" would be enough. --MarkS (talk) 19:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

I agree. It needs to be split, as the film bears enough fame and is distict enough from the book to be made into a new section.

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:53, 27 August 2007 (UTC)