Talk:City of Boerne v. Flores
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I changed the recent edit so that the first reference to Katzenbach v. Morgan, and not the second, is eliminated. It seems a great deal more appropriate to refer to Katzenbach in the section dealing with legal doctrine rather than in the section dealing with the background facts of this case. Also, if the second reference and not the first were eliminated, all this article would contain would be a passing mention of Katzenbach. This, I think, would be an egregious omission given the doctrinal importance of Katzenbach. Hydriotaphia 16:38, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Addition to existing City of Boerne v. Flores
We are students at the Savannah College of Art and Design, majoring in historic preservation. The catalyst for our involvement in Wikipedia was a final project for our Preservation Law course, led by the much acclaimed and admired Professor Lambin. In this course we study the legal aspects of historic preservation. This project not only relieves the monotony of the orthodox term-paper, but gives us a real world sense of contributing as 'up and coming' professionals in the field. Our contributions mean no disrespect to the prior contributors of this entry, and we have treated it as respectful as we could while fulfilling the criteria for our project. Furthermore, we hope we have contributed helpful information in a professional fashion. We would greatly appreciate withholding amendments to our contributions until May 26, 2008. Our grade relies heavily on our contribution. We have supplied our professor with a copy of this entry before we made any changes, and we don't claim any intellectual contribution to it as we found it. To learn more about our project, please visit:
[[1]]

