Talk:Citizens for a Free Kuwait

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Viewed in strictly moral terms, Kuwait hardly looked like the sort of country that deserved defending, even from a monster like Hussein.- how much more POV can you get?

This article is too biased to be included in Wikipedia.

The propaganda campaign should be made known.

[edit] This should be deleted

Why is this op-ed piece here dressed as an article? JDG 06:18, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

This needs to be rewritten as an article about this notable subject, not deleted. Please help. --FOo 21:31, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

No, it needs to go. If you have legit knowledge of this group then at least write a stub. Page has been listed at AfD. JDG 22:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

It exists. It should be on here, but it needs to be made NPOV.

I think it's a Sourcewatch piece, not a copyvio since Sourcewatch is GFDL, but should be credited and NPOV'd. 67.117.130.181 14:01, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

This article is so POV it's mind-boggling. "Bejewled hands" and a country that did not deserve being defended? This whole article needs to be cleaned up from top to bottom, also sources are missing. Gryffindor 21:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] This article makes me want to shoot myself, and here's why

Even damned near two years after the first complaints, this article reads like an op-ed piece. Black gold fiefdom, what in the holy hell? Come on, this is a notable subject, but the writing is atrocious. 72.138.111.182 (talk) 08:57, 20 March 2008 (UTC)