User talk:Christopher140691

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Suspected sockpuppet what the hell?? I have been on wikipedia for 6 days and this is how I get treated well I will be talking to Jimbo Wales about this as this is not on and will be losing alot of customers from wikipedia as I know the guy who does the advertising on google and a quick word with him and it will all be removed from the google search engine and all other search engines. I also happen to be a good friend of Jimbo and will be calling him in a minute if not unblocked. This is totally out of order. I will also file a complaint with Mike Godwin and see you all in court if this matter isnt sorted out."


Decline reason: "Go ahead, call Jimbo. (Unblock declined due to WP:NLT.) Stifle (talk) 11:11, 9 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "WP:NLT and WP:DOLT also http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/wikitort.htm also all contain valid reasons why I should sue wikipedia. There is no evidence what so ever that I am a supposed sockpuppet. I have been on this site 6 days as stated and have done NO vandalism at all and have been blocked for supposedly being a sock puppet. Can one of you many admins tell me how to file an OTRS when blocked?"


Decline reason: "Given that you haven't retracted your legal threat, I'm not going to unblock you. Regarding your question, have a look at Wikipedia:Contact us.— PhilKnight (talk) 12:16, 9 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I will retract my legal threat if I am unblocked as User:PhilKnight said that he would unblock if I do therefore I am retracting it."


Decline reason: "Obvious sockpuppet. – Steel 13:16, 9 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

(EC with above, this was my response to the unblock request): Considering that a) Your edit history and patterns of disrupting Wikipedia are identical to User:Chris19910 and that this account was registered soon after he was blocked, it is plainly that you are using this account to dodge a block, which is against the rules. If you wish to be unblocked, please request an unblock via your first account. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 13:18, 9 May 2008 (UTC)