Talk:Chrysler Concorde

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cars Portal
This article is within the scope of Wikipedia Project Automobiles, a collective approach to creating a comprehensive guide to the world of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you are encouraged to visit the project page, where you can contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] Infobox photo

I have made this photo especially with the infobox in mind, trying to abide by every rule and make it the most useful, so I will defend it to the last drop of blood. PrinceGloria 15:46, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Even when your argument makes no sense? It's somehow hard to see the profile in a car that shows it in full? It's not a strange perspective, it's just a car that looks strange in certain angles. Your photo is clearly not 3/4 front, and is clearly washed-out obscuring detail. I don't want to make an edit war out of this, but it doesn't really matter what effort was put into a photo, it matters how well it came out. IFCAR 21:58, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
I believe 3/4 refers to 3/4s of side and 1/4th of front end, not the other way around (as most of your best photos are made, e.g. the awesome and exemplary Maxima A33). I can touch-up my photo in due course, but I still believe that even for the time being it is both contentually and aestethically advantageous. PrinceGloria 09:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Yours is skewed more to the side view by either definition. But I'll let it go for now if you can say "contentually and aesthetically advantageous" fast five times. IFCAR 12:28, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Not only that, I can sing the Sailor Moon song in Japanese ;) PrinceGloria 12:43, 17 October 2007 (UTC)