Talk:Christian hardcore
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] General comment
People, please - this is not the way an article should be written. "Tough guy" should never NOT be in quotes! I can't believe this article. In fact, most of the music-genre articles are very, very bad.
YOU PEOPLE WHO DONT LIKE THE WAY THIS OR SIMALER ARTICALS ARE WRITTEN(I.E THE PERSON WHO WROTE THE ABOVE COMMENT)
should stop badgering people for the way they organize/write an article and leave it be (i.e. don’t say, think, or do any thing to the article) Or just edit the article to your likening (i.e. take the time to edit /revise the article/articles)antiedman 02:02 Am June/6th/2006
[edit] Criticism
Where should the "Criticism" section go? --Jamiem
- probably before Christian hardcore#Christian hardcore and metalcore bands. Paul foord 03:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] NPOV
specifically the criticism section but ouch does this reek of NPOV (even uses "we" and such) MengHuo 06:41, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Does this "article" sound like an advertisement for someone's band ("Death Is Not Welcome Here") to anyone else? This is hardly a significant band in the Christian hardcore scene. Yet they are the only one appearing with a direct link to their website.
[edit] Fixed intentional deletion
Someone intentially deleted the first paragraph and replaced it with a sentence that "Christian Hardcore is a joke"... I have fixed this... //// Pacific PanDeist * 06:57, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fixed Link
I fixed the link to Training For Utopia. Most articles with the reference have the incorrect capitalization, so I'm attempting to fix them. Jlricherson 05:09, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Christian Hardcore Shows
A few friends pointed me to this website recently, it has a lot of Christian Hardcore info including news, bands, labels, and interviews. Maybe it should be used as a resource for the article and added as an external link. http://www.christianhardcoreshows.com/ --68.190.244.49 04:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Criticism section is a joke
It is completely original research. First off, it equates a whole religion to a set of beliefs that are not even important. There is no Christian consensus on authority of government...This whole article is pretty much original research, but this section is ridiculous. Rewrite it and source within a week or so, or I am going to remove it.--Wick3dd (talk) 02:54, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] As Promised
I am back to make good on my above comment. However, I am going to rewrite and source rather than remove material. If I removed all the OR from this page, there would be no page. I welcome all feedback, and contribution would be greatly appreciated. I am taking a rather hard stance here though. Nothing that is not sourced. This is an easy topic to source so there is no excuse. Please do not revert anything without bringing it up here first. Also, I will try to put as much explanation as I can into edit summaries. G'day, thanks for the time.--Wick3dd (talk) 20:59, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

