Talk:Christian Voice (UK)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Christianity Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
Start	This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

Ahem, this kind of religeous hatred on wikipedia is embarrasing. Please delete this whole sorry page.

[edit] NPOV

Sometimes I hate NPOV. This bunch in general and Stephen Green in particular are fucking assholes.

Amen, dude.

Agreed. They're scum. They're basically the American Bible-Belt style Bible Thumpers, but right here in the UK. It's really tragic. It especially annoys me over Jerry Springer the Opera, which is fantastic. If you dont want to see it, fine, but dont attack people for wanting to, and dont judge them or the theatres, your own GOD says that you arent to judge, only him, so instead of hanging around outside theatres telling me Im going to hell for being gay and watching Jerry Springer, and forcing cancer charities to refuse money raised by Jerry Springer the Opera, instead just get lost, go do something like feed the homeless instead of wasting your time, AND stopping charities accepting money.

Scum.

Why hate NPOV? All NPOV means is that assertions need to be supported by evidence. If Christian Voice is a bunch of spiteful bigots - which I believe they are - there is no reason why it can't be demonstrated from an NPOV, ie with evidence. David L Rattigan 10:29 03 May 2006 GMT

Agreed, they're worthless scum. Fuck them. Luckily no one intelligent pays attention to their fucking evil work.

Personally, I think that listing their acts in the encyclopedia shows them for the narrow-minded bigots they are. I'm particularly thinking of the cancer charity that was intimidated into declining a donation from a production of Jerry Springer: the Opera. Autarch 21:20, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

---

I dont think they are THAT bad. But they are very misguided, ignorant and stupid people. But Hey Jesus loves them! One thing I do like is their article attacking the BNP on their website. They call them a bunch of "racist, paganist, evolutionist, volk-worshipping Nazis"!

---

i am afraid to say i cant find any evidence that they are against tolerance, peace and friendship between members of different faiths. in fact i dont think this is true, although there is evidence that they dont think highly of Islam and Hinduism. they did apparently express admiration at those Sikhs who protested that play in Birmingham. So i dont think they hate people of other religions or races. i dont even think that they hate gay people as such, but they certainly arent compassionate or understanding of the gay community.

---

I've removed the neutrality alert, as the issues I raised here (and which someone has subsequently deleted) have mostly be dealt with. FrFintonStack 15:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

"For example, they object to the proposals to end the practice of male-preference primogeniture for the succession to the Crown of the United Kingdom [1], which they believe would reduce the tax burden on families to encourage fathers to provide and mothers to care for their own children."

This is something of a non-sequiter. Has something been removed between "Crown of the United Kingdon" and "which they believe"? FrFintonStack 15:38, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

These people are cunts. In the most offence sense of the word imaginable.

I can only agree with the unsigned assessment above (indeed, it ranks as generous praise compared to my opinion of CV) but why is this ghastly organisation deserving of such a massive article here? The Christian Institute, another selection of vile bigots, has a way smaller article and yet is more notable. I am all for exposing the activities of mad-eyed loons like CV, but does it really warrant this much server space? 81.151.37.228 17:32, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyedit

Mostly tidying, but some poorly sourced material commented out (original retained in source text). These arose mostly (oh the irony!) from a rather literalistic and partial reading of Christian Voice's statements. Yes, they are an embarrassment to Christianity, but let's not fall into the same black/white trap! Material related to UK Life League commented out, not least as it has been deleted from the UK Life League page where it would better belong 84.92.241.186 22:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Trim

I hope this will not prove too controversial: I have significantly trimmed this article. It's length was (IMHO) absurd compared to the CV's (lack of) importance, and, worse, it regurgitated many of the CV's comments. We're not here to put CV's views on display for them! :-)

The article remains, I feel, too long, but... 86.153.93.235 (talk) 15:35, 26 March 2008 (UTC)