Talk:Chris Pozniak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chris Pozniak was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Reviewed version: January 9, 2007

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

	Association football Portal The article on Chris Pozniak is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the USA and Canada task force.

You were serious about this beign a GA? I'd say this needs a LOT of work in all aspects before then. --Wizardman 00:16, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

This page barely even qualifies as "Start-class". (Ghostexorcist 00:22, 9 January 2007 (UTC))

Look at the article Marc Pugh. His article is quite similar to this one, although slightly more in depth. It would be a challenge to find additional information for Chris Pozniak anywhere on the internet. м info 00:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, that article was passed seven months ago; perhaps requirements (not as far as how they're written, but as far as how users perceive them) have become more stringent in the past half-year. Or, perhaps the GAC failure is due to Wizardman's personal interpretation of WP:WIAGA. Personally, I would not have passed this article, either. -- Kicking222 14:14, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough. м info 02:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC)