Talk:Chloe Vevrier

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chloe Vevrier article.
Article policies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Pornography Portal
This article is part of WikiProject Pornography, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contents

[edit] DOB

I see alternate DOB as 1971 (most likely) and 1972 (least likely). Absent solid proof - I am not going to change the current version (1968)

[edit] Breasts

I don't believe, her breasts are natural. How can they grow from a F cup to a J cup by themselves?

If you read a lot about her, then you would probably know that they're natural. Plus, they don't even look fake at all. --Snkcube 06:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
To grow from an F cup to nearly a J cup (four cup sizes) over time, as Chloe's breasts have done, is quite possible. In some women, this happens due to ingesting of birth control pills, others by putting on weight (and retaining the excess in the bosom), and still others, through pregnancy. The moral of the story: just because a woman has developed a large bosom, it doesn't mean that she achieved it through plastic surgery. -- Jalabi99 06:09, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Natural look

Maybe it would be a good idea to mention, that in most of her movies and photo sessions she has hairy armpits and pubic area. This is a part of her natural look and it's unusual for an adult model, therefore it makes sense to mention it here. I'm not going to change the article because I've seen just a few pictures of her and no movie. This schoud make somebody, who knows more about it, and with a better Englisch than me. --maartinxxxx72 25 May 2006

[edit] External links

Why not be a little redundant and (also) list them in an "external links" section? —Disavian (talk/contribs) 00:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vevrier

While there is a certain (small) possibility of User:vevrier being Chloe Vevrier herself, I do not believe so, and proof would be difficult anyway. If you are, my apologies, no offense intended, but unless there's libel on here, you really should NOT be editing your own article at all - see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest 1.3 and 1.4. especially as most of your edits could be seen as pushing your own commercial interests.

Continuing on, I do not believe the above person is Vevrier, and it would be oh, so easy to get myself an account like User:ChloeVevrier or any such permutation myself and claim the same. Therefore, the edits have to be taken on their own, and they are mainly deletions (including a page blanking!). Therefore I will likely continue to revert them. MadMaxDog

Update: The above person is NOT Chloe Vevrier (see edit warring / edit summaries around the 14th February 2007) - after first claiming to be her ("My name and age removed...") he later notes that his edits are "merely updates of her career". No real person involved in an edit war over her own biography entry would suddenly start referring to herself in the third person. Point made. MadMaxDog 05:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
I agree with your assessment here. Good catch. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 06:42, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] NO PICTURE

Why is there no picture of chloe? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.101.213.232 (talk) 19:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC).

Because there are no public domain pictures of her known. Any would be appreciated. MadMaxDog 03:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Do these two pictures from last year's AEE show her [1] [2]? They have a CC-BY-2.0 license, so they can be used. If you upload them, please upload them to Wikimedia Commons. Thanks. --Rosenzweig 20:47, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
I have uploaded the second one (first one isn't that great). But the second one is awesome - just what we needed! Thanks for pointing me at them! Ingolfson 08:43, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
It has been a pleasure :-) ... --Rosenzweig 15:48, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Heterosexual or Bi-Sexual?

Now that's strange. She's listed as hetro, but she's clearly Bi as she's portrayed, and projects the image of a bisexual woman even on her own website. She has sexual intercourse with women, ergo, she's bisexual.

Tercero 19:43, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

If I may be blunt - that's a naive statement. She is an erotic actor. This article is, however, about HER, not about the roles she plays in many of her videos. There is no conclusive evidence that in real life she is either bisexual or lesbian. Ergo, by statistical default, she is likely to be heterosexual. You are not lesbian or bisexual just because you engage in lesbian or bisexual work. You are lesbian or bisexual if that is what you do in your own free time, or what you consider yourself.
To clarify, I've got no problem with her POSSIBLY being lesbian/bisexual. However, there's no proof either way, so the only thing you could ask for is for the 'Orientation' line to be blanked. MadMaxDog 06:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Well. I could call myself a cactus. Doesn't mean that I am though. Could you blank the line for her Orientation then. It's annoying the heck out of me when I read something that's unconfirmed. Tercero 18:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

"Well. I could call myself a cactus. Doesn't mean that I am though." - That is correct. Therefore, Chloe calling herself a lesbian or bisexual when advertising for her photo sets does not make her one. I'd have nothing against a reference from her specifically stating that she considers herself one, but it should be more than "Let me show you how I have hot sex with...".
Anyway, fixed as you requested. MadMaxDog 02:42, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
She should not be listed as any given sexuality until we find a WP:RS confirming it. List of LGBT people and its subdivisions relies on a high standard of sources.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 19:25, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Eh... which is just the case now? Ingolfson (talk) 05:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Escorting

I see someone put in the story about Chloe having been an escort in New York in 2001 but it was taken out again. There have been several reports that Chloe has been an escort, particularly for the New York agency Nici's Girls. The pornstar afficionado Seth "aka the Doctor", who published an amateur video of Linsey Dawn McKenzie giving him oral sex, has said that he paid for sex with Chloe on two occasions. Views please on putting in a reference to there having been several reports about her escorting?

I have no issues with the story itself (I put it in the first time, though not correctly following Wikipedia policy). However, this is a pretty heavy thing, to claim somebody works/worked as an escort for sex. To many people that is morally despicable, and therefore wrongly or spuriously claiming it would be libel. As this article has to follow WP:BLP, there is really no question of putting it in unless it has some rock-solid references. MadMaxDog 06:56, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
PS - new talk page stuff always goes to the bottom of the page.MadMaxDog 06:56, 3 July 2007 (UTC)