User talk:Chimpywiki

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

Notability of Wicklewood Massiv

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Wicklewood Massiv, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Wicklewood Massiv seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Wicklewood Massiv, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wymondham College. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:48, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Wymondham College. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Snowolf How can I help? 21:53, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Wymondham College

I'm trying to unblock these needless revertions that all the techno geeks are making to your Wymondham College contributions but I'm not sure how much luck I'll have. They are a humourless bunch. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spongebobq (talk • contribs) 22:06, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Chimpywiki for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. haz (talk) 22:13, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Wymondham College. Poeloq (talk) 22:41, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- Ed (Edgar181) 12:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Having done nothing since my last warning, I fail to see why I am being blocked from editing. Are you just a really angry man?"

Decline reason: "The sock puppetry seems clear. You also do not seem to have any intention of editing constructively. Kuru talk 14:56, 26 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "What sock puppetry?? I thought we had already been through this and explained that spongebobq is my friend who I go to school with? I had been given a final warning, and consequently had stopped making unconstructive edits, yet I was then told I was going to be blocked indefinitely anyway? Surely the fact that I stopped making phony edits is proof that I'm going to stop from now on?"

Decline reason: "Given that you admit making phony edits, and that another account made the same phony edits, I think we can confident of sock puppetry. However, we could have a change of heart. See below for details of a possible second chance. — Addhoc (talk) 16:01, 26 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

  • Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
  • Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • Click edit this page on that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
  • Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = Article title =)
  • Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article.
  • When are you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Addhoc (talk) 16:01, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Done some proper editing!"

Decline reason: "reason —unconvinced, make a pseudo article on your talk page does not convince me. this is also your third decline and you're only allowed two. — Rlevse • Talk • 14:29, 27 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.