Talk:Chinese Buddhist canon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. Please participate by editing the article Chinese Buddhist canon, or visit the project page for more details on the projects. Guidelines: Chinese Manual of Style - Naming conventions Indic Manual of Style - Naming conventions Japanese Manual of Style Korean Manual of Style - Naming conventions Tibetan Proposed naming conventions
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Article Grading: The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

What, if anything, is meant by the term "canonical"? If we compare the three main branches of present-day Buddhism, we find various rough strata of literature:

1. Theravada
   1. Pali canon
   2. Commentaries: collected editions published in ceylon, Burma and thailand
   3. Subcommentaries: collected edition published in Burma
   4. Other Pali literature
   5. Vernacular literature
2. East Asian Buddhism: collected Taisho edition comprising
   1. Indian (& pseudo-Indian) writings ascribed to the Buddha
   2. Indian writings not ascribed to the Buddha
   3. Chinese writings
   4. Japanese writings
3. Tibetan
   1. Kanjur: Indian writings ascribed to the Buddha
   2. Tenjur: Indian writings not ascribed to the Buddha
   3. Tibetan literature

Books on Buddhism commonly include an appendix on scriptures covering 1.1, 2.1-3 & 3.1-2. Is there any rational objective basis for this selection? Peter jackson 18:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure, but there may be one based on the relative importance that the adherents themselves have tended to give to the texts in question. Also, the above should be clarified to note that not all sutras are precisely the putative words of the Buddha; some are spoken by disciples. It may be the case that all literature in this class purportedly was spoken by somebody during or shortly after the Buddha's lifetime.—Nat Krause^{(Talk!·What have I done?)} 00:45, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Long Term Project

It would be nice if someone has the time, ability and inclination to translate and render phonetically the Chinese titles on this page.Sylvain1972 20:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC)