Talk:Chief knowledge officer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No. If the title of CKO is different in scope than that of CIO they should not be merged but instead should be linked to each other. I would like more information on how many companies and organisations actually have positions for a CKO rather than a CIO, though.--Mike 01:48, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Shouldn't the section on the Knowledge life-cycle be incorporated into the [Knowledge Management] page? I don't know what it has to do with the CKO. Jackvinson 19:52, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] needs more wiki

This reads like an advertisement some how. Mathiastck 17:06, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

- Agreed. Phrasing partially copied from linked Skyrme website. 85.182.70.42 23:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

-- This page is awful, we ought to scale it right down to something like: "An executive position in some companies related to knowledge-management." Rather than have a page that reads like an advertisement for some stupid corporate consultancy. The article doesn't even use proper English.

[edit] Citated CKO definition

Chief Knowledge Officers are defines as "the leaders of their organizations' knowledge management initiatives (Bonner, 2000, p.36; Rasmus, 2000; p.5) and as "senior executives responsible for ensuring that an organization maximizes the value it achieves through one of its most importent assest - knowledge" (Skyrme, 1997). And much more definitions and description of the CKO be found in Dfouni & Croteau (2003) - Knowledge Management Roles and Technological Issues: An international Web-based Delphi Study.

Later i will try to include most of the aspect in these definitions in one description for this term. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chipman NL (talk • contribs) 10:57, 18 February 2008 (UTC)