Talk:Chicago (poem)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Illinois This article is part of WikiProject Illinois, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles related to Chicago.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.


from VfD:

School essay. Original research? Mikkalai 06:16, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

  • I'd venture "unoriginal research", but yes, delete --fvw* 06:38, 2004 Dec 17 (UTC)
  • Delete. Original poem analysis. Not encyclopedic. jni 07:01, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not an encyclopaedia article. P Ingerson 08:25, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Original poem analysis. Not an encyclopaedia article. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 08:48, Dec 17, 2004 (UTC)
  • Assuming it's not a copyvio, keep and move to Chicago (poem). Very notable. Everyking 09:54, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • I agree with Everyking. Cleanup, encyclopedicize and move to Chicago (poem). Samaritan 10:14, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Keep, move, and cleanup. The poem is worthy of an article. This analysis needs major cleanup, but it may be helpful to a future editor. -- Smerdis of Tlön 16:24, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Just someone's reaction to a poem--not encyclopedic. Niteowlneils 16:33, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Merge, crummy essay, it's ok now, but one of the two articles has to go. Wyss 23:38, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • keep' Yuckfoo 04:54, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion

[edit] Copyvio

being that this was written less that 100 years ago, are we sure this is not copyrighted? I'm going to investigate. AdamBiswanger1 16:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Because it was published in the U.S. before 1923, that's why... AnonMoos 00:42, 17 December 2006 (UTC)