From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "Ryulong has blocked me for vandalism. This is unjustified. There has been no vandalism. There has been no warning of vandalism. He has blocked me because he doesn't want anyone to see what I wrote on WP:CSN. If you unblock me, I am willing to either not edit and only file an ArbCom request OR continue editing normally and not file an ArbCom request. Ryulong has a history of aggressively blocking anyone he doesn't like; as proof look at me. I haven't had any contact with him until now so his misbehavior is solely based on his displeasure of my edit, which was nicely written and not attacking. NOTE RYULONG - it is a conflict of interest for Ryulong to deny this unblock request and to blank it out"
Decline reason: "Defacing userpages to say someone is about to block you...yes, that is vandalism. — User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 07:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
From June 2007: [1]
[edit] Unblocked
Welcome back, I hope things go better this time. DurovaCharge! 17:35, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Old accusations
Hi Chergles, I hope you are enjoying yourself on WP, I'm glad you were able to clear up the accusation that you were a sockpuppet. I notice you're archive talk page is listed at Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Anacapa - it would be perfecty acceptable for you to remove the template on User_talk:Chergles/archives listing you as a suspected sock since you are clearly not one--Cailil talk 17:57, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
