User talk:CheetahKeeper/Archive May 2007

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Re: Slight update...

Hi. A Welcome to Wikipedia from Brooklyn. I've done the slight update you made note of on the Prospect Park Zoo talk page, plus a few other odds 'n ends. Review at your leisure; Take care — Gosgood 20:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Australia Zoo

Here's an example:

"Australia Zoo aims to be the world's leading zoological destination, and its motto of Conservation through Exciting Education is manifest in every aspect of Zoo life. From the moment when you arrive and are introduced to an endangered Tasmanian Devil or colourful macaw, to the thrill of seeing your first crocodile strike or the unparalleled feeling when an elephant takes a piece of fruit from your outstretched hand. Australia Zoo is in the business of making connections between humans and animals. They are helping to forge not only an understanding, but a deep and genuine passion for our precious wildlife in people of all ages and backgrounds."

This paragraph (and others) are clearly not written from a neutral point of view. It shows a commercial bias towards the zoo. Admittedly, I could have chosen a better edit summary than "PR puffery", but I can't change that :) CloudNine 12:15, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wood Oaks

Thanks CK, I'm glad that I'm not the only one watching that page. I swear it draws more vandalism than all the articles I've written put together. The anonymous vandal even left a nice message on my talk page. -Joelmills 02:40, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Good idea, but I don't think it gets vandalised enough to get semiprotected. Besides, it has the most entertaining vandalism [1] of any page I watch. --Joelmills 15:18, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Australiazoologos.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Australiazoologos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:44, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Wildlife Warriors logo.jpg

Hello CheetahKeeper, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Wildlife Warriors logo.jpg) was found at the following location: User:CheetahKeeper. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:23, 19 May 2007 (UTC)