Talk:Cheng Hoon Teng

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. Please participate by editing the article Cheng Hoon Teng, or visit the project page for more details on the projects. Guidelines: Chinese Manual of Style - Naming conventions Indic Manual of Style - Naming conventions Japanese Manual of Style Korean Manual of Style - Naming conventions Tibetan Proposed naming conventions
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

	This article is supported by WikiProject Malaysia. This project provides a central approach to Malaysia-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] World Heritage Site category removed

Dear fellas, Malaysia does not have any cultural world heritage in the UNESCO list yet. Pls check List of World Heritage Sites in Asia and Australasia and have both articles tally and correct.

Is it ok to remove the {gcheck} copyediting tag? Any objections? Please explaim (if any).

I have ammended some of my mistakes, anyway. There is nothing much to copyedit such a short article.

tan 19:09, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

I'm afraid that there is, and your edits didn't deal with any of them (with the possible exception of "notable" for "peculiar". You moved a fact from one place to another for no obvious reason, added a vague and past-tense passive construction (something that I and others have explained on numerous occasions isn't aceptable), and removed the description "richly decorated". Genuine problems (such as what or who is "entombed", and where) remain untouched. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 21:55, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

I copyedited the article & fixed some grammatical problems.

--Kmorrow 08:25, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

But it still needs work.. --Kmorrow 08:31, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

Nice work. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 11:57, 29 May 2005 (UTC)